TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Fermented Infertile Egg Flour on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Status and Carcass of Broilers Raised in High Density Pens
AU - Anggraeni, Dian
AU - Sunarti, Dwi
AU - Sugiharto, Sugiharto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, University of Agriculture. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective of the current study was to explore the impact of S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour on the growth performance, blood profile, antioxidant status, and carcass traits of broilers raised in high-density pens. At days 26–42, 290 chicks were divided into 4 groups, including CONT (chickens raised at normal density [10 birds/m2] and fed basal diet), HSD (chickens raised at high density [16 birds/m2] and fed basal diet), HSD+EFS (chickens raised at high density and given basal diet with 0.7% S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour) and HSD+ESFS (chickens raised at high density and given basal diet with 0.7% S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour plus 0.001% selenite fermented by S. cerevisiae). The final body weight at day 42 and weight gain from 26 to 42 days in the HSD and HSD + ESFS treatments were less (p < 0.05) than in the CONT; however, there was no difference between the CONT and HSD + EFS treatments. Although the feed conversion ratio (FCR) did not vary between HSD and HSD+EFS, FCR was lower (p < 0.05) in CONT compared to HSD + EFS. In comparison to HSD+ESFS, CONT had a greater (p < 0.05) feed intake, but neither HSD nor HSD+EFS were affected (p > 0.05). Compared to CONT, the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were similar in the HSD, HSD+EFS, and HSD+ESFS treatments. In contrast to the HSD treatment, SOD levels were lower (p < 0.05) in the HSD+EFS and HSD+ESFS treatments. Compared to CONT, HSD had a reduced (p < 0.05) percentage of breast meat, but it did not vary (p > 0.05) from HSD + EFS or HSD + ESF. Overall, in high-density conditions, broilers could maintain growth when fed S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour. The S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour was effective in protecting broilers from high-density-induced stress.
AB - Objective of the current study was to explore the impact of S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour on the growth performance, blood profile, antioxidant status, and carcass traits of broilers raised in high-density pens. At days 26–42, 290 chicks were divided into 4 groups, including CONT (chickens raised at normal density [10 birds/m2] and fed basal diet), HSD (chickens raised at high density [16 birds/m2] and fed basal diet), HSD+EFS (chickens raised at high density and given basal diet with 0.7% S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour) and HSD+ESFS (chickens raised at high density and given basal diet with 0.7% S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour plus 0.001% selenite fermented by S. cerevisiae). The final body weight at day 42 and weight gain from 26 to 42 days in the HSD and HSD + ESFS treatments were less (p < 0.05) than in the CONT; however, there was no difference between the CONT and HSD + EFS treatments. Although the feed conversion ratio (FCR) did not vary between HSD and HSD+EFS, FCR was lower (p < 0.05) in CONT compared to HSD + EFS. In comparison to HSD+ESFS, CONT had a greater (p < 0.05) feed intake, but neither HSD nor HSD+EFS were affected (p > 0.05). Compared to CONT, the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were similar in the HSD, HSD+EFS, and HSD+ESFS treatments. In contrast to the HSD treatment, SOD levels were lower (p < 0.05) in the HSD+EFS and HSD+ESFS treatments. Compared to CONT, HSD had a reduced (p < 0.05) percentage of breast meat, but it did not vary (p > 0.05) from HSD + EFS or HSD + ESF. Overall, in high-density conditions, broilers could maintain growth when fed S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour. The S. cerevisiae-fermented infertile egg flour was effective in protecting broilers from high-density-induced stress.
KW - Antioxidant
KW - broiler
KW - fermentation
KW - infertile egg
KW - stocking density
KW - yeast
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001578620
U2 - 10.21162/PAKJAS/25.375
DO - 10.21162/PAKJAS/25.375
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001578620
SN - 0552-9034
VL - 62
SP - 131
EP - 139
JO - Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences
JF - Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences
IS - 1
ER -