TY - GEN
T1 - Sinusoidal Current Control Strategies for Single Phase Grid-Connected Renewable Power Generation Systems
AU - Setiawan, Iwan
AU - Facta, Mochammad
AU - Hermawan,
AU - Andromeda, Trias
AU - Purnomo, Mauridhi Hery
AU - Taufik,
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/9/24
Y1 - 2020/9/24
N2 - This paper aims to present and compare several popular models of current reference tracking strategies for single-phase grid-connected renewable power generation systems. The sinusoidal current control models discussed in this paper include conventional proportional-integral control, proportional-resonant control, hysteresis control, and d-q synchronous reference frame control. To ensure the injected sinusoidal current is in phase with the grid voltage, the synchronization technique also well known as the T/4 delay phase-locked loop (PLL) is employed in this work. For the performance evaluation, all of the current controllers are simulated under the Simulink-MATLAB environment. Based on simulation results, the current controlled with PI controller suffers from the steady-state error. For the relatively small magnitude of current reference, the Hysteresis control system seems to be superior to others, whereas, for the higher reference magnitude, the best performance is achieved by the d-q synchronous reference frame control and the PR control systems.
AB - This paper aims to present and compare several popular models of current reference tracking strategies for single-phase grid-connected renewable power generation systems. The sinusoidal current control models discussed in this paper include conventional proportional-integral control, proportional-resonant control, hysteresis control, and d-q synchronous reference frame control. To ensure the injected sinusoidal current is in phase with the grid voltage, the synchronization technique also well known as the T/4 delay phase-locked loop (PLL) is employed in this work. For the performance evaluation, all of the current controllers are simulated under the Simulink-MATLAB environment. Based on simulation results, the current controlled with PI controller suffers from the steady-state error. For the relatively small magnitude of current reference, the Hysteresis control system seems to be superior to others, whereas, for the higher reference magnitude, the best performance is achieved by the d-q synchronous reference frame control and the PR control systems.
KW - T/4 delay PLL
KW - current controller
KW - dq synchronous reference frame control
KW - hysteresis control
KW - proportional-integral control
KW - proportional-resonance control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097309557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICITACEE50144.2020.9239212
DO - 10.1109/ICITACEE50144.2020.9239212
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85097309557
T3 - 7th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering, ICITACEE 2020 - Proceedings
SP - 241
EP - 246
BT - 7th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering, ICITACEE 2020 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 7th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering, ICITACEE 2020
Y2 - 24 September 2020 through 25 September 2020
ER -